Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 776 S.W.2d 152 - Otis Elevator, Co. v. Bedre

Otis Elevator, Co. v. Bedre’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont))

Relationships

Relies on Waples-Platter Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance · Otis Elevator Co. v. Bedre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Error Affecting Only Part of Case. If the error affects part of, but not all, thgjmatter in controversy and that part Is separable without unfairness to the parties, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered only as to the part affected by the error. The court may not order a separate trial solely on unliquidated damages if liability is contested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.