Eddes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sanders v. State · Richardson v. State · Armour v. State · Hogshooter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The credibility of witnesses is for the motion court’s assessment, and it may reject testimony even though no contrary evidence is offered. Richardson v. State, 719 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Mo.App.1986). The movant has the burden of proving his asserted grounds for relief by a preponderance of the evidence. Armour v. State, 741 S.W.2d 683, 688 (Mo.App.1987).” Eddes v. State, 776 S.W.2d 463, 465 (Mo.App.1989). “Our review is limited to determining whether the findings, conclusions, and judgment of the motion court are clearly erroneous.” Jones v. State, 773 S.W.2d 156, 157 (Mo.App.1989).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Pruitt v. State · Phillips v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.