Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Sherman v. United States · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California · United States v. Natale · United States v. Ladd · United States v. Goodapple
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Arguments made by counsel during opening statements and summation are not evidence and thus cannot be said to raise an affirmative defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Money v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.