Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 777 F.2d 1066 - Mares v. Marsh

Mares v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

777 F.2d 1066 · 1985

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
6
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Doe ex rel. Doe v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort Wayne (1986), Frankel v. Bally, Inc. (1993)

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

36019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · United States v. Orleans · California v. Civil Aeronautics Board · Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb · Cryts v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the extent of the employer's right to control the”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “employer” is basically “a person [including an entity] engaged in an industry affecting commerce who has fifteen or more employees_” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b). 3 . The economic realities test applied in cases under the Fair Labor Standards Act deems persons employees "if they ‘as a matter of economic reality, are dependent upon the business to which they render service.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is considered inconsistent with the remedial purposes behind such legislation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.