Hernandez-Robledo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
777 F.2d 536 · 1985
Citation profile
48 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015 · most notably Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio Yang (1996), Braun v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1993)
48 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1151 (§ 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang · Mabry v. Johnson · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Errico Scott · McMullen v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the inquiry is not into the illegality of his or her presence in the United States but the reasons that an alien should be allowed to stay, despite the illegality.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although this court reviews the decision of the BIA, we may properly consider the IJ's findings if in conflict with those of the BIA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.