Baca v. Adams

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submission Deferred Jan. 8, 2015.

Decided Resubmitted Jan. 30, 2015.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2015-01-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2020

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-01-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Patrick J. Hennessey, Jr. (argued), Law Office of Patrick Hennessey, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2 *1035David Delgado-Rucci, Kevin Vienna (argued), Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for RespondentAppellee.

¶3Before: KOZINSKI, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5Respondent’s unopposed motion to summarily reverse the district court’s judgment is hereby GRANTED.

¶6The judgment below is REVERSED. The district court is directed to enter an order granting a conditional writ of habeas corpus, releasing Baca from custody unless the state of California retries him within a reasonable period of time.

¶7REVERSED and REMANDED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.