Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 777 F.3d 1198 - Davila v. Gladden

Davila v. Gladden’s Empirical Analysis

777 F.3d 1198 · 2015

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000B · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Foman v. Davis · Pearson v. Callahan · Turner v. Safley · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “view the evidence and all factual inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and resolve all reasonable doubts about the facts in favor of the non-movant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Congress did not unequivocally waive its sovereign immunity in passing RFRA. RFRA does not therefore authorize suits for money damages against officers in their official capacities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.