Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 777 F.3d 741 - Fontenot v. McCraw

Fontenot v. McCraw’s Empirical Analysis

777 F.3d 741 · 2015

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1341

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Goldberg v. Kelly · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person required to hold a license under Section 521,021 shall: (1) have in the person's possession while operating a motor vehicle the class of driver’s license appropriate for the type of vehicle operated; and (2) display the license on the demand of a magistrate, court officer, or peace officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “A case becomes moot-and therefore no longer a 'Case' or 'Controversy' for purposes of Article III-'when the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “allegations by a defendant that its voluntary conduct has mooted the plaintiff's case require closer examination than allegations that 'happenstance' or official acts of third parties have mooted the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.