Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 777 NW2D 213 - Walen v. State

Walen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · State v. Knaffla

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the evidence must be favorable to the defendant because it would have been either exculpatory or impeaching; (2) the evidence must have been suppressed by the prosecution, intentionally or otherwise; and (3) the evidence must be material—in other words, the absence of the evidence must have caused prejudice to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reasonable probability is one that is sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.