State v. Wessendorf’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Walker · State v. Johnson · State v. Velarde · State v. Dyer · State v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his eonduct[,] when he is aware of but consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor’s standpoint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morgan“[t]he risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise in all the circumstances as viewed from the actor's standpoint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warden“must be of such a degree that an ordinary person would not ... fail to recognize it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.