McCall v. Coats’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2018
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rozier v. Ford Motor Co. · Nordin Construction Company v. City of Nome · National Bank of Alaska v. McHugh · Montgomery Ward v. Thomas · State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) be such as would probably change the result on a new trial; (2) have been discovered since the trial; (3) be of such a nature that it could not have been discovered before trial by due diligence; (4) be material; (5) not be merely cumulative or impeaching.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Babinec v. Yabuki“may relieve a party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for ... fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Westfall“newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.