Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

777 So. 2d 1005

Sasek v. Craig

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-12-15

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2018

10 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon examination of the pleadings and the text of the order appealed, we conclude that the lower court did not commit reversible error in its declaration concerning the structure proposed to be built on appellant’s lot in Glenwood Hammock. We conclude, however, on the cross-appeal, that appellees were the prevailing parties below and that the trial court erred in failing to award attorneys’ fees and costs to appellees. Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the appealed judgment denying fees and remand for the lower court to determine a reasonable fee and costs.

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

HARRIS, J., and JOHNSON, C.T., Associate Judge, concur.GRIFFIN, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part, with opinion.
/777/so2d/1005 · .json · Public domain