Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

777 So. 2d 1018

Friedman v. Pope

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 27, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-12-27

Relies on 632 So. 2d 1377 - Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Deason

Decided 2000-12-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. This denial is without prejudice to petitioner objecting to follow-up deposition questions which seek information protected by the work product as defined in Southern Bell Telephone & Telgraph Co. v. Deason, 632 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1994), and *1019section 766.106(5), Florida Statutes (1999). Follow-up deposition questions regarding matters that occurred after the notice of intent to initiate litigation was served do not, based on this fact alone, constitute work product.

¶2Petition denied.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur. '
/777/so2d/1018 · .json · Public domain