777 So. 2d 1020 - Delafield v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 760 So. 2d 85 - State v. Perkins · Ware v. State · Turben v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The gravamen of the holding in [State v.] Perkins[, 760 So.2d 85 (Fla.2000),] is that identity is no different from other evidence that must be suppressed following an unconstitutional stop. In a prosecution for driving with a suspended license, the essential evidence consists of the officer’s discovery of the identity of the defendant as the driver at the time of the arrest. When the stop is tainted, so is the identification evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.