Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rush’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fabre v. Marin · 363 So. 2d 1077 - Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. · 659 So. 2d 249 - Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. Center · 486 So. 2d 552 - Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boynton · 144 So. 2d 813 - Sharer v. Hotel Corporation of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statutes must be construed as to avoid an unreasonable or absurd result”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“provisions of an act are to be read as consistent with one another”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.