Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 777 So. 2d 1113 - Daniels v. State

777 So. 2d 1113 - Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · Alford v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`A motion for judgment of acquittal should be granted in a circumstantial evidence case if the State fails to present evidence from which the jury can exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilty.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.