Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 777 SO2D 317 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State · 471 So. 2d 493 - Ex Parte Faircloth · 516 So. 2d 726 - Jackson v. State · Powe v. State · 439 So. 2d 715 - Maxwell v. City of Mobile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The majority concludes that, because the defendant did not intone the mantra, "The State has failed to prove a prima facie case,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The evidence is insufficient to convict my client and the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the prosecution has failed to make a prima facie case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.