State ex rel. C.P.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 719 So. 2d 445 - State, in Interest of Sm · In re J.M.P. · Gilcrease v. Gilcrease · 698 So. 2d 761 - State in Interest of KB · In re Lagarde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Courts shall avoid delays in resolving the status of the parent and in achieving permanency for the child. La. Ch.Code art. 1032. All phases of termination of parental rights proceedings are thus to be given priority. State in the interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), 719 So.2d 445, 453 (La.1998). Consistent with the statutory scheme of expediency, the Louisiana Children’s Code provides that appeals shall be taken within fifteen days from the signing of the judgment, or from the mailing of notice of judgment when required. La. Ch.Code art 332.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.