Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 A2D 1044 - Flonnory v. State

Flonnory v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Sheppard v. Maxwell · In re Oliver · Mattox v. United States · Turner v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “essential ingredient of this right is for jury verdicts to be based solely on the evidence presented at trial”) (citing Hughes v. State, 490 A.2d 1034, 1040 (Del.1985); see also Turner v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466 , 85 S.Ct. 546 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965) and In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 , 68 S.Ct. 499 , 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948)). 39 . Flonnory v. State, 778 A.2d 1044, 1052 (Del.2001) (stating that an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury’s attention or whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.