Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.2d 1271 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.2d 1271 · 1985

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2012 · most notably United States v. Armstrong (1996), Peso Chavez v. The Illinois State Police (2001)

34 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Caminetti v. United States · Wayte v. United States · Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois · United States v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may ... be entitled to discovery on the issue of selective prosecution if he introduces ' "some evidence tending to show the existence of the essential elements of the defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “does not create a substantive right for the defendant which he may enforce, and is not subject to judicial review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “internal guideline for the exercise of prosecutorial discretion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.