Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.2d 1386 - Backlund v. Barnhart

Backlund v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.2d 1386 · 1985

Citation profile

230
cited by 230 later decisions
5
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

131 federal appellate · 12 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 230 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc. (1993), Myers v. Morris (1987)

131 federal appellate · 12 district · 7 state decisions

15001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Davis v. Scherer · Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 230 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud or other misconduct; (4) a void judgment; (5) a satisfied or discharged judgment; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from operation of judgment.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so egregious that any reasonable person would have recognized a constitutional violation.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'must show that the particular facts of [plaintiff's] case support a claim of clearly established right.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.