Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.2d 1471 - Corbitt v. Andersen

Corbitt v. Andersen’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.2d 1471 · 1985

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Phelps v. Wichita Eagle-Beacon (1989), Merritt v. Mackey (1987)

24 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

20019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Paul v. Davis · Wilson v. Garcia · Griffin v. Breckenridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'foreclosed his freedom to take advantage of other employment opportunities.' ... The jury heard sufficient evidence regarding the initial health and worth of Corbitt's private practice and could reasonably conclude that [the defendant's] actions weakened and devaluated it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he views of a resident federal district judge concerning the local law of his home state are entitled to some deference by an appellate court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reputation alone, apart from some more tangible interests such as employment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.