Davis v. Allsbrooks’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.2d 168 · 1985
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably United States v. Griffin (1990), 9 Cal. 4th 824 - People v. Stansbury (1995)
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions — followed in 16 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Ohio v. Roberts · United States v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“convert admirable precautionary measures ... into an investigatory obstruction”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Though informing a suspect that he is not under arrest is one factor frequently considered to show lack of custody, it is not a talismanic factor. Where, as here, the entire context establishes a lack of custody, failure to inform defendant of his status is not dispositive.”) (citations omitted), and (2) here, unlike in Parker , the officers questioned Beard for only a short period of time. 4 . In so holding, we do not discount the possibility that the giving of Miranda warnings itself can contribute with other circumstances to put a suspect into”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.