Kendrick v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.2d 253 · 1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2003
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 300Z
Relies on Essgee Co. of China v. United States · In Re Wheat Farmers Antitrust Class Action
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to indicate any prejudice or unnecessary burden which resulted from the delay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7479, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,068 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for American Commerce National Bank, Anaheim, California v. Gerald J. Garner Joan Garner Scott B. Garner Craig Garner Daniel Garner Robin Garner Zimmett Keith Zimmett, Esq., Ltd. Keith Zimmett, Agent · FDIC v. Garner“before or during the taking of the deposition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.