Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.2d 396 - Bunch v. Heckler

Bunch v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.2d 396 · 1985

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2016

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Johnson v. Heckler · McNeil v. Califano · Taylor v. Schweiker · Davis v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Is the claimant currently unemployed? (2) Is the claimant’s impairment severe? (3) Does the impairment equal or exceed one of a list of specific impairments? (4) Is the claimant unable to perform his or her former occupation? (5) Is the claimant unable to perform any other work in the national economy”? Any affirmative answer leads either to the next step, or on steps (3) and (5) to a determination that the claimant is disabled. A negative answer, at any point other than step (3), stops inquiry and leads to a determination that the claimant is not disabled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “review of the Secretary's findings is limited to a determination of whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence based on the record as a whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.