United States v. Rinke’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.2d 581 · 1985
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 7 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably United States v. Perez (2002), United States v. Tarantino (1988)
41 federal appellate · 7 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Berger v. United States · Nix v. Williams · Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n · Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review for whether venue lies in a particular district is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and making all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the finder of fact, the Government proved by a preponderance of direct or circumstantial evidence that the crimes charged occurred within the district.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.