Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.2d 591 - United States v. Rivera

United States v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.2d 591 · 1985

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably United States v. Cardall (1989), United States v. Reyes (1986)

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

17019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · United States v. Russell · Opper v. United States · Lombard v. Marcera · Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In United States v. Peterson, 611 F.2d at 1330 , we stated that although we determined it was preferable, whenever possible, to require the Government to first introduce independent proof of the conspiracy and subsequently to establish the connection of the defendant with it before admitting hearsay declarations, there was an exception recognized where it was not reasonably practicable to require the showing to be made before admitting the evidence; in such a case the trial judge could admit the hearsay statements, subject to their being connected up later.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We 'must not permit the integrity of the jury to be assailed by mere suspicion and surmise; it is presumed that the jury will be true to their oath and conscientiously observe the instructions and admonitions of the court.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.