Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.2d 722 - United States v. Eirin

United States v. Eirin’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.2d 722 · 1985

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably United States v. Beale (1991), United States v. Hooshmand (1991)

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

210198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · United States v. Nixon · United States v. Beechum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “show that (1) the evidence is relevant to an issue other than a defendant's character and (2) the probative value of the evidence outweighs any prejudicial effect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Merely refusing to sign a waiver of rights form without an attorney's guidance is not synonymous with an affirmative request for assistance of counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We warn prosecutors in this circuit that straying from what is charged to get to other matters more prejudicial will be condemned, convictions will be reversed, and where appropriate, disciplinary action will be recommended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.