Cooper v. Bergeron’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.3d 294 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Jackson v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hyatt v. Gelb · Miranda v. Kennedy“AEDPA constraints do not apply where a state court decision does not resolve a federal claim that was presented to it, and a habeas court will afford de novo review to the claim,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miranda v. Kennedy“some extreme malfunction in the state court's decision[ ] to warrant § 2254 relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Green v. Kenneway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.