Mendez v. May’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.3d 337 · 2015
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9001 · 22 U.S.C. § 9003
Relies on Abbott v. Abbott · Chafin v. Chafin · Mozes v. Mozes · Friedrich v. Friedrich · 134 S. Ct. 1224 - Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“grapple[d] with difficult factual circumstances in which no outcome may [have] appear[ed] ideal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.