United States v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.3d 396 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3153 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3552 · 18 U.S.C. § 3558 · 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · United States v. Cavera · United States v. Robinson · United States v. Park · United States v. Conca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is the expectation that district judges will receive and use that information in determining a defendant's sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on the issue of guilt in a criminal judicial proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.