Saunders-El v. Rohde’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.3d 556 · 2015
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Kyles v. Whitley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · United States v. Ruiz · Newsome v. McCabe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Brady does not require the creation of exculpatory evidence, nor does it compel police officers to accurately disclose the circumstances of their investigations to the prosecution.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] police officer does not violate an acquitted defendant’s due process rights when he fabricates evidence.”); Massey v. Ojaniit, 759 F.3d 343 , 354 (4th Cir. 2014) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.