In re Nora’s Empirical Analysis
778 F.3d 662 · 2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Liteky et al United States · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · In Re Robert J Snyder · Hendrix v. Page · Hartz v. Friedman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sanctions are warranted under Rule 38 when a litigant or attorney presents appellate arguments with no reasonable expectation of success for the purposes of delay, harassment, or sheer obstinacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter Of Lisse“until the time, if ever, that Nora submits further inappropriate filings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter Of Lisse“frivolous and needlessly antagonistic filings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter Of Lisse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.