Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.3d 849 - Monfore v. Phillips

Monfore v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.3d 849 · 2015

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn · Trierweiler v. Croxton & Trench Holding Corp. · Case v. Abrams · Sill Corp. v. United States · R.L. Clark Drilling Contractors, Inc. v. Schramm, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Third-Party and Aeroquip Corporation, a Michigan Corporation, Additional v. F.B. Wright Company, a Corporation Philadelphia F.B. Wright Distribution Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Third Party-Defendants-Appellees

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ensure[s] everyone involved has sufficient incentive to fulfill the order's dual purposes of encouraging self-editing and providing reasonably fair disclosure to the court and opposing parties alike of their real trial intentions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.