778 F. Supp. 2d 1267 - Barker v. DOLLAR GENERAL’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Burns v. Windsor Insurance · Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp. · Lowery v. Alabama Power Co. · Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plaintiff's denial of a request for admission which read 'you do not claim in excess of $75,000 as total damages in this case' was not sufficient to support jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dunlap v. Cockrell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.