Bunch v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
31 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Langley v. State · Lowery v. State · Wrinkles v. State · Troxel v. Troxel · Sanders v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“between waiver as an affirmative defense and a discretionary judicial doctrine that forecloses an issue on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Highler v. State · Strong v. State“[Cllaims available on direct appeal but not presented are not available for post-conviction review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In particular, the Bunch court clarified that, because waiver as an affirmative defense is governed by Indiana Trial Rule 8(C)-which requires parties to plead waiver as an affirmative defense and, as a consequence, places the burden of proof at trial on the party asserting such affirmative defense-it is only applicable in circumstances where the party asserting waiver has argued such defense before the lower court. Id. By contrast, the latter form of waiver, which is more appropriately described as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Highler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.