Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 NE2D 475 - Woodson v. State

Woodson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Langley v. State · Spradlin v. State · Terry v. State · Bailey v. State · Nelson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any issue set forth in a post-conviction petition must be raised within the purview of the post-conviction rules, e.g., deprivation of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, or [as] an issue demonstrably unavailable to the petitioner at the time of his trial and direct appeal. Therefore, in a post-conviction petition an allegation of the denial of the petitioner’s due process rights may not be raised in the “free’ standing” form of an allegation of fundamental error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.