Smith v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 176 Ind. App. 141 - Blaising v. Mills · Wickey v. Sparks · Kopis v. Savage · Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Ellison · Bischoff Realty, Inc. v. Ledford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Agency is a relationship resulting from the manifestation of consent by one party to another that the latter will act as an agent for the former.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“If you find that One Hour Photo is entitled to a verdict against [ADI] for Fraud, you may then award One Hour Photo special damages in an amount that will reasonably compensate for the following elements of claimed loss or harm. The amount of such award may include the following elements. One, reasonable expenditures incurred as a proximate result of the fraudulent conduct. While there must be some evi-denee upon which an award for damages can be made, uncertainty of dollar amount does not prevent the award of damages. No particular degree of mathematical certainty is required in awarding damages so long as the amount awarded is supported by evi-denee in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[al principal is liable for any misrepresentations of his agent undertaken within the seope of the agency, whether or not the principal has knowledge of the fraud. " Appellants' Br. at 21 (quoting Smith v. Brown, 778 N.E.2d 490, 495 (Ind.Ct.App. 2002)). We note, however, that "one who asserts that there was an agency relationship has the burden of proving its existence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Keesling v. Beegle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.