Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 NW2D 361 - Carse v. State

Carse v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · State v. Kindem · Leake v. State · Dukes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] district court must submit to a jury the question of whether the State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of additional facts, which were neither admitted by the defendant, nor necessary to prove the elements of the offense, but which support reasons for departure. But the question of whether those additional facts provide the district court a reason to depart does not involve a factual determination and, therefore, need not be submitted to a jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “original venire was replaced with a new panel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.