Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 P.2d 1371 - People v. Ratcliff

People v. Ratcliff’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
8
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably State v. Jones (1992), State v. Moore (2004)

41 state decisions

2501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'more likely true than false' level of certitude but by a common-sense, nontechnical standard of reasonable cause to believe, with due consideration being given to a police officer's experience and training in determining the significance of his observations to the ultimate issue of probable cause.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When viewed in isolation, the discrete acts of the defendant are not dispositive and could be rationalized as involving only ‘suspicious behavior.’ The defendant’s actions, however, are not independent. When viewed in their entirety, the individual acts fit together like pieces of a puzzle, and provide a reasonable basis for concluding that a drug transaction has taken place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “While an officer’s subjective intent is a factor which a court may consider in determining whether the purpose of an intrusion was reasonable, it is not critical to a resolution of that question. What is determinative is whether the purpose of the intrusion was reasonable in light of the objective circumstances confronting the officer at the time and place in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.