Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 P.2d 233 - State v. Mullin

State v. Mullin’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)

Relies on Rewis v. United States · Dixson v. United States · State v. R.H. · Dailey v. State · 651 F. Supp. 283 - United States v. Ricketts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A public servant commits the crime of receiving unlawful gratuities if, for having engaged in an official act which was required or authorized and for which the public servant was not entitled to any special or additional compensation, the public servant (1) solicits a benefit, regardless of value; or (2) accepts or agrees to accept a benefit having a value of $50 or more.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ny officer or employee of government, whether elected or appointed, and any person participating as an advisor, or consultant, engaged in the service of process, or otherwise ■ performing a governmental function.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.