778 So. 2d 1068 - Vasquez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Boyd · 724 So. 2d 1176 - Wallace v. State · Woods v. State · 711 So. 2d 633 - Jones v. State · 757 So. 2d 1227 - Nicholson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The proper analysis to determine whether offenses arise from the same criminal episode requires consideration of the following factors: 1) whether separate victims are involved; 2) whether the crimes occurred in separate locations; and 3) whether there has been a temporal break between the incidents.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dixon v. State · Jenkins v. State“[a] violation of double jeopardy constitutes fundamental error which may be raised for the first time on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.