Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 556 So. 2d 1094 - Sheats v. State · Cantu v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The appellant also claims that he has recently discovered that his codefend-ants and the State entered into a ‘deal.’ However, under Rule 32.1(e)(3), Ala. R.Crim.P., such a discovery amounts only to impeachment evidence; it does not constitute newly discovered evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.