Cayson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 600 So. 2d 1088 - Drayton v. State · 642 So. 2d 492 - Hiett v. State · 646 So. 2d 159 - Swicegood v. State · 662 So. 2d 915 - Maddox v. State · 644 So. 2d 34 - Lockett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Rule 32.5 clearly provides: “ ‘ “Petitions filed under this rule shall be filed in and decided by the court in which the petitioner was convicted. If a petition is filed in another court, it shall be transferred to the court where the conviction occurred.” [[Image here]] “ ‘See also Rivera v. State, 615 So.2d 659 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (“Rule 32 petitions are properly entertained by the court in which the defendant was convicted”).’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hanna v. State““Rule 32.4, Ala.R.Crim.P., specifically provides that other than posttrial motions under Rule 24 and an appeal ‘any ... post-conviction petition seeking relief from a conviction or sentence shall be treated as a proceeding under [Rule 32].’ ‘Habeas corpus is not the correct remedy to correct errors and irregularities in a trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.’ Smith v. State, 440 So.2d 1222, 1224 (Ala.Crim.App.1983).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hanna v. State“Rule 32.4, Ala.R.Crim.P., specifically provides that other than posttrial motions under Rule 24 and an appeal `any . . . post-conviction petition seeking relief from a conviction or sentence shall be treated as a proceeding under [Rule 32].'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.