778 So. 2d 338 - Whetstone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 668 So. 2d 954 - Terry v. State · 669 So. 2d 247 - The Florida Bar v. Marke · 719 So. 2d 335 - State v. Rivera · 739 So. 2d 672 - Mosley v. State · 370 So. 2d 795 - In Interest of ME
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Based on the evidence, we believe appellant's possessory interest in the jointly-leased premises was equal to that of his wife at the time of the incident. Appellant's wife was not living in the house at that time, and her change in residence effectively neutralized any superior possessory interest she might have had predicated on her payment of the rent. We, therefore, conclude the evidence is insufficient to sustain appellant's conviction of the offense of burglary of a dwelling.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.