Knapp v. Knapp’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · 616 So. 2d 436 - Miller v. Schou · 651 So. 2d 1252 - Nelson v. Nelson · State, Dept. of Revenue v. Sumblin · 754 So. 2d 903 - Stebbins v. Stebbins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the parties enter into an agreement for payments for ... support, ... and the circumstances or the financial ability of either party changes ... after the execution of the agreement or the rendition of the order, either party may apply to the circuit court ... for an order decreasing or increasing the amount of support ... and the court has jurisdiction to make orders as equity requires, with due regard to the changed circumstances or the financial ability of the parties or the child, decreasing, increasing, or confirming the amount of separate support ... provided for in the agreement or order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The court initially entering an order requiring one or both parents to make child support payments has continuing jurisdiction after the entry of the initial order to modify the amount and terms and conditions of the child support payments if the modification is found by the court to be in the best interests of the child ... [or] if there is a substantial change in the circumstances of the parties ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An increase in the ability to pay may be sufficient to increase child support payments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.