¶1Affirmed. See Bentley v. State, 501 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla.1987); Watson v. State, 437 So.2d 702, 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (stating that “the legislature did not intend to require a finding that an operable handgun be involved in order to sustain a conviction of robbery with a firearm”), modified on other grounds, 453 So.2d 810 (Fla.1984).
778 So. 2d 479
Hilaire v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 21, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-02-21
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2002
1 state decisions
Relies on 501 So. 2d 600 - Bentley v. State · 437 So. 2d 702 - Watson v. State · Reese v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-02-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →