¶1Appellant was sentenced to concurrent equal sentences as both a habitual offender and a prison releasee reoffender. The state concedes that resentencing is required pursuant to Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). We therefore reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Grant.
778 So. 2d 509
Sneed v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 28, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-02-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2002
1 state decisions
Relies on Grant v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-02-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →