Morovitz v. Morovitz’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Hogrebe v. Hogrebe · State v. Hines · Klinge v. Klinge · Boyer v. Boyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the application of the child support guidelines and criteria set forth in section 452.340 and applicable supreme court rules to the financial circumstances of the parties would result in a change of child support from the existing amount by twenty percent or more, a prima facie showing has been made of a change of circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the present terms unreasonable, if the existing amount was based upon the presumed amount pursuant to the child support guidelines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Selby v. Smith““It is within the discretion of the trial court to impute income to the noncustodial parent according to what he could have earned by the use of his best efforts to gain employment.” Morovitz v. Morovitz, 778 S.W.2d 369, 371 (Mo.App.1989) cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1085 , 110 S.Ct. 1822 , 108 L.Ed.2d 952 , citing Hogrebe v. Hogrebe, 727 S.W.2d 193, 195 (Mo.App.1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hopkins v. Hopkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.