Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 SW2D 707 - Nunn v. State

Nunn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2018

1 district · 7 state decisions

501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Armour v. State · Futrell v. State · Stokes v. State · State v. Johnson · Tomlin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The right of a prosecuting attorney to testify in a criminal case is strictly limited to those instances where his testimony is made necessary by the peculiar and unusual circumstances of the case. Even then, his functions as a prosecuting attorney and as a witness should be disassociated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a lawyer who assumes both of those roles in a single case makes it more difficult for opposing counsel to conduct effective cross-examination and creates an awkward scenario in which one advocate must challenge the credibility of his legal adversary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.